Oil & Gas Wellhead Sealing: Extending Seal Life from 3 Months to 18 Months

Challenge
A wellhead equipment OEM needed FKM O-rings capable of continuous service in a sour gas field where hydrogen sulfide (H2S) concentrations reached 15% by volume at 150°C and 300 bar static pressure. Standard FKM compounds failed within 3 months: seals progressively hardened, lost elastic recovery, and leaked during pressure cycling — forcing unplanned wellhead interventions during active production seasons at a direct cost exceeding US$40,000 per event in rig time and personnel.
Solution
Root-cause analysis identified two concurrent failure mechanisms: chemical attack on the FKM polymer backbone by H2S at elevated temperature (a known limitation of standard 65–66% fluorine Type 1 FKM), and mechanical extrusion through a clearance gap measuring 0.18 mm — above the safe limit for 300 bar service. We specified a high-fluorine FKM Type 2 compound (70%+ fluorine) with 90 Shore A hardness for extrusion resistance, and paired it with spiral PTFE backup rings on the low-pressure side of the assembly to close the extrusion path.
Result
Seal service life extended from 3 months to over 18 months — a 6× improvement — eliminating all unplanned wellhead interventions during the production season. Total seal-related cost per wellhead per year fell by approximately 70% when amortized across material, labor, and avoided rig time. The OEM standardized this compound and backup-ring specification across all sour gas wellheads in the field, covering 24 active installations.
Details
Operating environment: The wellheads handled a raw gas stream containing 15% H2S, 8% CO2, saturated water vapor, and C1–C4 hydrocarbons at 150°C and 300 bar. The O-ring glands were in static face-seal service but subject to pressure cycling of ±50 bar during well test operations. Ambient temperature at the surface installation ranged from −10°C in winter to +45°C in summer.
Original failure mode: Standard FKM (Type 1, 65–66% fluorine) seals showed a consistent failure pattern. Within 6–8 weeks, seals became noticeably harder on extraction. By 10–12 weeks, Shore A hardness had increased from the nominal 75 to over 90, and the seals no longer recovered their original cross-section after removal from the gland. Leakage began as micro-seepage visible at the flange face and progressed to detectable flow within days. Metallurgical and elastomer analysis confirmed the mechanism as thio-sulfurization: H2S reacts with residual cure-site monomers and low-fluorine polymer segments, causing additional crosslink formation and embrittlement.
Why standard FKM fails in H2S: FKM resistance to H2S is a function of fluorine content and cure system. Type 1 FKM (65–66% F) contains vinylidene fluoride (VF2) monomer, which is susceptible to H2S attack at temperatures above 120°C. The reaction introduces sulfur crosslinks, increases hardness, and raises the glass transition temperature — the same progression observed in this application. High-fluorine FKM Type 2 (GF-type, 70%+ F) replaces a portion of VF2 with perfluoromethyl vinyl ether (PMVE), which is not reactive with H2S, producing a compound with substantially better resistance to sour service at 150°C. This is consistent with NACE TM0187 and ISO 15156 guidance on elastomer selection for sour service.
Extrusion analysis: At 300 bar, the maximum safe diametral clearance gap for 75 Shore A FKM is approximately 0.10–0.12 mm. The original gland was machined to a nominal clearance of 0.15 mm, but manufacturing tolerance produced some assemblies with gaps up to 0.20 mm. Upgrading to 90 Shore A raised the safe clearance limit to approximately 0.18 mm, but we recommended adding PTFE spiral backup rings as an additional safeguard — both to handle tolerance variation in the gland and to account for any thermal expansion of the housing that could open the gap at operating temperature.
Backup ring selection: We evaluated both PEEK and PTFE spiral backup rings for this application. PEEK offers higher hardness and dimensional stability, but its chemical compatibility with H2S/H2O sour brine at 150°C required additional verification. PTFE spiral rings are chemically inert across the entire fluid spectrum present in this application and provided adequate extrusion resistance when paired with the 90 Shore A FKM primary seal. PTFE's low friction also simplified assembly and reduced the risk of gland scoring during ring insertion.
Validation testing: The upgraded seal assembly was tested per a protocol combining ASTM D395 Method B (compression set at 150°C/70 hours), NACE TM0187 sour gas immersion (15% H2S at 150°C for 168 hours), and a pressure cycling test (100 cycles from 0 to 310 bar). Post-test measurements confirmed compression set below 18% (versus >45% for the original compound), no visible surface cracking, and no dimensional change exceeding 2% — all within the OEM's acceptance criteria.
Procurement and supply details: The OEM required traceability to raw FKM compound batch and cure parameters for every production lot. We supplied a certificate of conformance, compound data sheet, and batch-specific test results (tensile, elongation, hardness, compression set) with each shipment. Standard lead time for this specification was 10 business days; an emergency stock program was negotiated for the three most common sizes (AS568-330, -334, -338) to support planned and unplanned maintenance.
Procurement takeaway: When specifying FKM for sour service above 120°C, require the supplier to confirm fluorine content (minimum 70% for Type 2 or GF-grade) and to provide compression set data at operating temperature per ASTM D395. Standard FKM datasheet temperature ratings do not account for H2S chemical attack — the material must be qualified by immersion test, not just temperature chart.
Related Resources
Oil & Gas Industry Page
See the broader industry page for common sealing requirements and recommended materials.
Open resourceFKM Material Page
Open the related material page for temperature range, compatibility, and sizing support.
Open resourceCustom Seals
Send your drawing, sample, or performance target for custom development support.
Open resourceHave a Similar Challenge?
Tell us about your application and we will recommend a solution.


